Scenario Simulator

Free Multi-Site Staffing Simulator

Get an instant, policy-ready estimate without spreadsheets.

Calculator Inputs

What This Calculator Does

Simulate staffing allocation across multiple sites.

This calculator is built for practical HR and payroll workflows and gives instant outputs.

Inputs Explained

  • Number of Sites: Numeric value: use your policy-compliant value for accurate output.
  • Required Staff per Site: Numeric value: use your policy-compliant value for accurate output.
  • Available Staff: Numeric value: use your policy-compliant value for accurate output.

Formula

Formula details are shown based on your inputs.

Example Calculation

  • Sites: 1
  • Staff per site: 1
  • Available staff: 1
  • Total Required Staff 1
  • Coverage Gap 0

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this tool free?

Yes. You can use this Timetaag tool without registration.

Can I use this for payroll checks?

Yes. Use it for quick validations before final payroll processing.

Related Tools

Multi-Site Staffing Simulator: Calculating Headcount Across Multiple Locations

Running staffing models across multiple sites introduces complexity that single-location planning tools cannot handle: different demand volumes, shift patterns, local labour laws, and the possibility of sharing coverage between sites. This guide explains how to build a consolidated multi-site headcount model and where inter-site sharing creates genuine value — and where it creates risk.

Centralised vs Decentralised Staffing Models

The fundamental choice in multi-site HR planning is whether staffing decisions are made centrally or by each site independently:

Centralised Model

A single HR or workforce planning team sets headcount for all sites. Benefits include consistent standards, pooled flex capacity, and economies of scale in recruitment. Risk: loses local context and can under-resource sites with unusual demand patterns.

Decentralised Model

Each site manages its own staffing independently. Benefits include local responsiveness and accountability. Risk: duplication of effort, inconsistent standards, and inability to share under-utilised capacity between sites.

Hybrid Model

Central teams set headcount guidelines and shared flex pools; local managers handle day-to-day scheduling within those parameters. Most large multi-site organisations operate some version of this model.

Shared Service Centre

Non-site-specific functions (payroll, HR administration, IT support) are consolidated into a single centre that serves all sites. Headcount at each site focuses on operationally location-dependent roles only.

Total Headcount Calculation Across Sites

The multi-site headcount model starts by calculating gross required headcount at each site independently, then applies a shared coverage adjustment:

Site Headcount = (Daily Required Staff × Operating Days per Year) ÷ (Annual Available Days per FTE)

Example: (15 staff × 260 days) ÷ (230 days per FTE) = 16.96 → 17 FTEs required at this site

Total Network Headcount = Σ (Site Headcount) − Inter-Site Sharing Credit

Example: Site A (17) + Site B (12) + Site C (9) − 3 shared FTEs = 35 total FTEs

Site Daily Requirement Gross FTEs Sharing Credit Net FTEs
Site A (HQ)1517−116
Site B (North)1112−111
Site C (South)89−18
Total3438−335

Inter-Site Coverage Sharing

Inter-site sharing allows staff from one location to cover another during peak demand or absence spikes. The viability depends on geographic proximity, travel cost, employee willingness, and contractual flexibility:

Planning principle: Model inter-site sharing as a contingency buffer, not as a permanent staffing component. Sites should each be able to meet their minimum requirements independently. Sharing credit should only be claimed for scenarios above minimum — treat it as a peak capacity tool, not a baseline headcount reduction mechanism.
Model your multi-site headcount

Enter each site's requirements in the simulator above to calculate total network headcount and identify sharing opportunities.

Run Simulation ↑

Frequently Asked Questions

How do different local labour laws affect multi-site headcount planning?

When sites operate in different countries or states, each site's headcount model must use the local working hours cap, overtime threshold, and minimum rest period requirements. A site in France will require significantly more FTEs for the same output volume than an equivalent site in the US due to the 35-hour week and mandatory holiday entitlements. The simulator allows separate parameters per site to account for these differences.

What is the right way to handle shared services headcount in a multi-site model?

Shared service headcount should be modelled separately from site operational headcount. Allocate shared service FTEs to a central cost centre, then apportion the cost (not the headcount) to sites based on usage or a fixed allocation key such as site revenue or headcount proportion.

How do I model headcount for a new site opening?

Use the demand ramp-up curve — new sites typically reach full utilisation over 3–9 months. Model headcount in three phases: pre-opening (setup and training staff only), ramp-up (30–70% of steady-state requirement), and steady-state (full requirement). This prevents over-hiring on day one and under-serving customers as demand grows.

Disclaimer: This calculator is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or financial advice. We do not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the results. Please consult a qualified professional for advice specific to your situation.